On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:12:15PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:45:37PM -0500, Adam Majer <adamm@galacticasoftware.com> wrote: > > Your logic is flawed. *Most* users are most certainly i386. > > By saying that it does work for *most* users, then a package > > for Architecture: any that segfaults on all archs except i386, > > could not have grave bugs against it... > > You snipped the part where I said, "fine, leave it grave." There's no > need to continue telling me why you think it should be grave. There > really isn't. There's not a "really, honestly, I totally think it's grave, > there's no need to keep telling me that it is" severity, so instead I'll > just say it on -devel again: > > YOU WIN. IT'S GRAVE. > > That fact probably does not make upstream any more responsive or really > provide ANY help WHATSOEVER with FIXING the damn thing, but hey, now > everyone knows it's grave. Surely that's an accomplishment worth noting. > > (If I seem like I'm being overly rude or angry about this, don't take it > personally; I've recently quit smoking and I fear nobody can escape my > withdrawal-induced wrath) Well, you guys can kiss XFree86 goodbye, then. It was nice having it in Debian. -- G. Branden Robinson | You can have my PGP passphrase when Debian GNU/Linux | you pry it from my cold, dead branden@debian.org | brain. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Adam Thornton
Attachment:
pgpZFXshW8pCc.pgp
Description: PGP signature