On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:12:14PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mar., 2012-07-10 at 16:07 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:50:29PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > On lun., 2012-07-09 at 20:28 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > > > Thanks, Joss! > > > > > > > > As a result, I've applied your patch in SVN, Luca. Thank you for your > > > > patch! > > > > > > Well, that look just wrongs to me. What is the rationale? > > > > If the svg lib is being pulled in by gdk-pixbuf, then there's no reason > > for us to explicitly depend on it -- the r-deps of libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0[1] > > have the biggies covered -- gdm3, gnome-shell, lightdm-gtk-greeter -- > > I'm pretty sure any GTK+ app that consumes the SVG should have a dep on > > this package. > > > > We could actually drop the Recommends now that I think about it. Anyone > > have a problem with me doing that? > > My feeling is that it's irrelevant, if we want our svgs to be displayed, > then we should make sure the loader is there. > -- > Yves-Alexis I'm on the fence. I don't know enough about the svg situation wrt gdk/gtk. Since you're a maintainer of both librsvg and desktop-base joss, is there any way you could make a judgement call? Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature