On mar., 2012-07-10 at 16:07 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:50:29PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On lun., 2012-07-09 at 20:28 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > > Thanks, Joss! > > > > > > As a result, I've applied your patch in SVN, Luca. Thank you for your > > > patch! > > > > Well, that look just wrongs to me. What is the rationale? > > If the svg lib is being pulled in by gdk-pixbuf, then there's no reason > for us to explicitly depend on it -- the r-deps of libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0[1] > have the biggies covered -- gdm3, gnome-shell, lightdm-gtk-greeter -- > I'm pretty sure any GTK+ app that consumes the SVG should have a dep on > this package. > > We could actually drop the Recommends now that I think about it. Anyone > have a problem with me doing that? My feeling is that it's irrelevant, if we want our svgs to be displayed, then we should make sure the loader is there. -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part