Re: About that List?
On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 1:28 pm, Florian Reichert wrote:
> Hello!
>
Hi
> I don't now exactly, what the intention this Mailinglist is, so I may be
> OT here.
>
> What I am missing in the debian Project is a desktop release. I had many
> Problems with the 3.0 release, for example the cdwriting stuff is not up
> to date, the kde and other desktop software is outdate, the ghostscript
> version caused many Problems on my system ...
The normal viewpoint is that debian stable is too old for desktop use. I would
recommend that if you want a debian desktop then you use testing or unstable.
I think that testing is up to date right now with KDE 3.1 rather than the 2.2
version in debian 3.0 and more recent versions of most software.
Or you coulds run unstable. I have been using unstable for a year now and I
have had no major problems with it. personly I think the name is more of a
disclaimer rather than a massive problem. I would not let my mum use it but
if you know about unix sysmin or you know people to ask about it then you
might as well.
> But updating this packages by backports or testing/unstable Versions is
> tricky and could/should not be done by any user.
I read the debian-kde mailing list and the people who try out the kde
backports always seem to get into problems. This could be because 1) no one
post sucesses or 2) kde is a lot of packages and murphys law is sure to take
a hold at some point. My advice is to go the whole hog and use testing.
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKDE
is where you can find the backport instrutions
> I thought about knoppix to be the solution for this, but ran into new
> Problems, because you can't update the deb packages of knoppix with the
> apt tools. (sure, technikal that works, but koppix has no own server for
> ne deb Packages, so you have to use again the esting/unstable Packages).
> So the only way to update knoppix in an secure way is to install it new
> from a knoppix CD or to select the deb packages by your own, to avoid
> truble.
>
I don't think knoppix is part of debian and I think that knoppix problems
should probley be sent somewhere where the people behind it can hear.
> The solution I would sugest is to have a Debian Desktop Distribution,
> based on knopiix, with its own server for the deb packages.
>
> What is your opionion ... If there is anyone reading this list ...
I dont think that a fork needs to happen between the server and desktop sides
of debian. More could be done for the desktop overall, but debian does the
best it can with the software it has got. I think the linux desktop problems
need to be solved higher upstream.
>
> Regards
>
> Florian
>
--
Peter Nuttall peter@nuttall.ukfsn.org
Reply to: