Re: spam fighting and the bts
In article <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org> email@example.com writes:
>On Fr, 2004-04-09 at 09:08, Blars Blarson wrote:
>> In article <[🔎] 20040408180356.GA9473@kalypso> firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>> >You wrote:
>> >> This is raw mail volume, that enters into promail.
>> >Any idea how much of this is legitimate mail?
>> Looks to be about 700/day.
>But out of, e.g. 52078/day these aren't really 51378 messages SPAM *per
I should have said about 700/day are non-spam messages delivered to bugs.
There are also a few messages going to some other mailboxes, and some mail
bounces. It might be as low as 51000 of those messages were spam.
>Is spohr doing something else than BTS -- mail-based?
The figure was only for mail to bugs.debian.org. (Including a few aliases
that forward to bdo.)
Blars Blarson email@example.com
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.