[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spam fighting and the bts



In article <[🔎] 1081501637.7070.4.camel@o2.net.philkern.de> phil@philkern.de writes:
>On Fr, 2004-04-09 at 09:08, Blars Blarson wrote:
>> In article <[🔎] 20040408180356.GA9473@kalypso> bas@debian.org writes:
>> >You wrote:
>> >> This is raw mail volume, that enters into promail.
>> >Any idea how much of this is legitimate mail?
>> Looks to be about 700/day.
>
>But out of, e.g. 52078/day these aren't really 51378 messages SPAM *per
>day*, right?

I should have said about 700/day are non-spam messages delivered to bugs.
There are also a few messages going to some other mailboxes, and some mail
bounces.  It might be as low as 51000 of those messages were spam.

>Is spohr doing something else than BTS -- mail-based?

The figure was only for mail to bugs.debian.org.  (Including a few aliases
that forward to bdo.)


-- 
Blars Blarson			blarson@blars.org
				http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.



Reply to: