Re: spam fighting and the bts
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 04:48:20PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Longer-term, I think spamscan needs to be rewritten to processes
> multiple messages at a time.
I definitely always intended this to happen eventually. spamscan was
initially written in somewhat of an emergency situation and a
single-process model was good enough then to be a significant
I shouldn't think it would be difficult to fork several worker processes
and hand out messages to them.
Colin Watson [email@example.com]