|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:42:31 +0200 (CEST) || Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> wrote: at> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> To me, the <cdd>-doc need be build together with the core package >> since it document a "picture" of the package and because of this >> should be release with it. >> >> Looks not so dificult merge it in each package and I think is the >> better thing to do. Possible, each maintainer can realize it in your >> package and you, me and someothers do it in core package. What you think? at> Well, you are right here in principle but this would require that we at> relay on a certain text processing kit. While I used debiandoc-sgml for at> cdd-doc I have used linuxdoc sgml for med-doc and Mako mentioned XML. at> While I'm more or less convinced to use some kind of XML (I have seen at> a really good looking document at LinuxTag) I think we can not force at> anybody to a certain toolkit. I personally have no strict preferences at> and my choices came out of historical reasons which are: But this will be used to build the cdd-* packages. Not to built the #CDD#-doc package. If the user need one documentation package he should choose what he like to use. cdd-doc can use sgml and med-doc, built using cdd-dev, latex. I don't see any problem on it. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house."
Attachment:
pgpod0G1pJvdD.pgp
Description: PGP signature