|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:26:49 +0200 (CEST)
|| Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> wrote:
at> doc/
at> cdd/
at> ...
at> med/
at> ...
at> ...
at> which would fail in matching the logic above but a separation between cdd and
at> projects would be to much, IMHO. An alternative to this suggestion would
at> be to include a doc directory directly in each projects directory. This
at> might be a good idea if we decide to build even the <cdd>-doc package together
at> with the meta packages but currently I do not plan to realize this idea which
at> comes sometimes into my mind.
To me, the <cdd>-doc need be build together with the core package
since it document a "picture" of the package and because of this
should be release with it.
Looks not so dificult merge it in each package and I think is the
better thing to do. Possible, each maintainer can realize it in your
package and you, me and someothers do it in core package. What you think?
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
Attachment:
pgpfO5UTv427s.pgp
Description: PGP signature