On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 02:00:03AM -0800, Alexander Hvostov said: > > utterly useless to everything else. If you want to 'indicate exactly' > what you 'want to be done with followups' to your message, use Reply-To. > That's exactly what it's for, it's defined in an RFC, _and_ you can > expect every mailer out there to honor it, not just yours. That's exactly NOT what it's for, and that's not what's defined in the RFC, but if you haven't even addressed that in the numerous posts to that effect, much less had it squeeze into your skull, there's not much point in continuing to throw clues through the hole in your glove. -- "Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as the result of an unsolicited email message. Nor will I forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online community." - Roger Ebert, "The Boulder Pledge"
Attachment:
pgpawQhZwvohm.pgp
Description: PGP signature