[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#797533: New CTTE members

>>>>> "josh" == josh  <josh@joshtriplett.org> writes:

    josh> That's not a bad plan, actually.  The three standard options
    josh> could be, in effect, "preliminary injunction against the
    josh> maintainer to avoid immediate harm, but we still need to talk
    josh> about this more", "dismissed as completely inappropriate to
    josh> have taken to the TC at all", or "we need further discussion
    josh> before we can even offer an opinion".

Sure, and I'd also argue that someone on the TC should believe that an
option other than FD should win before holding a vote.
We don't need more process for process's sake.
But having something like this in place and an understanding on the TC
that if k TC members (probably k = 1) feel this is reasonable calling
for such a vote is a fine thing to do.


Reply to: