Bug#727708: Additional CTTE Drafting Meeting useful?
Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Re: Additional CTTE Drafting Meeting useful?"):
> In this case I suggest to decide just the question of the default init
> system on Linux architectures first and address further details later if
> no consensus can be found elsewhere. Finding the correct wording then
> should be easier.
I strongly object to this approach for the reasons I have given
If I am given the opportunity to do so, if such a resolution is
proposed I will always propose amendments to settle the T vs L
If I am not given the opportunity to do so, that would be because
someone proposes a set of options which do not answer the tying
question, and immediately calls for a vote.
Under the circumstances that would be IMO a clear breach of process.
I hope that now that I have made this perfectly clear, that this will