On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 07:49:10PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > As a consequence, I am questioning the motivation behind all this, and > asking myself if we aren't seeing here (yet) another instance of > miss-behavior from Ganneff, who probably disliked the fact that I > defended my friend when he expelled him, and when I questioned the > possibilities of getting rid of the NEW queue in a debian-devel thread. > I have of course no proof to back this up Then I strongly recommend that you refrain from suggesting something like the above in the future. I don't think that anyone in our community should go around spreading that kind of accusations, unless they're backed by *very* convincing evidence. I believe that the negative side-effects of doing so are far worse than anything that could possibly be be gained (technically or otherwise). FWIW I'm in charge as DPL for only 1.5 more days so I'll leave this up to Lucas to pick, in case something DPL-ish is actually needed. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature