[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Draft GR for permitting private discussion

Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org> writes:

> I don't think infeasible or unconstructive are the best qualifiers.
> Unconstructive discussions are not necessarily bad since they can easily
> be ignored.  I'm hard pressed to come up with an infeasible case (except
> perhaps when one does not have the ability to send mail over the
> internet).

Counterproductive, perhaps?  That's the best word that I can come up with
to capture my concern, which is that forcing some of these discussions to
be public would make the underlying problem considerably worse.

Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to: