Re: Draft GR for supermajority fix
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Draft GR for supermajority fix"):
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 06:16:42PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Please do feel free to suggest improvements to the wording. I want
> > this to be clear and unambiguous.
> > How about if we s/supermajority/majority/ in what I just proposed ?
> No, that's clear at all. The 1:1 majority would fall under that
> too. How about something where N > M?
If the 1:1 majority falls under it too then the proposed text works
correctly, surely ?
> > Certainly we would like to run all the votes concurrently.
> So just make you call for vote for all of them during the same