Re: Draft GR for advice re overruling
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: Draft GR for advice re overruling"):
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:11:22AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > In the past the Technical Committee have been slow and reluctant
> > ----- GENERAL RESOLUTION OPTION A -----
> > The Technical Committee's approach so far has been correct.
> What's the point of mentioning "slow" above? I don't think anyone wants
> the tech-ctte (or any other Debian body, fwiw) to be slow on purpose.
> That might come as a consequence of something else (e.g. reluctance),
> but then you should ask for advice on that rather than on slowness.
> Suggestion: drop "slow and".
Done in my draft.