Re: Technical Committee proposed GRs, and amendments, again
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:38:20AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Technical Committee proposed GRs, and amendments, again"):
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:19:36AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > The way I imagine this working is that we nominate one TC member (me,
> > > I guess) to do the work of soliciting second opinions from other TC
> > > members, actually formally accepting obvious amendments, and so on.
> > So basicly you're going to say: "We will probably accept it, but
> > need to vote on it"? And you'll just wait a while for all the
> > different amendments to be available and then vote on it?
That works for me.