Re: Technical Committee proposed GRs, and amendments, again
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Technical Committee proposed GRs, and amendments, again"):
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:19:36AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > The way I imagine this working is that we nominate one TC member (me,
> > I guess) to do the work of soliciting second opinions from other TC
> > members, actually formally accepting obvious amendments, and so on.
> So basicly you're going to say: "We will probably accept it, but
> need to vote on it"? And you'll just wait a while for all the
> different amendments to be available and then vote on it?