[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#436093: Please decide on the "ownership" of the developers reference

On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:35:30AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [070806 10:18]:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:16:23AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > 1. at the moment something is commited to CVS, the changes are already
> > > active on the website;
> > That seems an important point to me -- if that's the case, then committing
> > is publishing, so changes simply shouldn't be committed until they've
> > been reviewed.
> If it would be otherwise, I probably wouldn't care half as much.

So from other mails it looks like Raphael accepts that, and can come
to a reasonable procedure for contributing with you remaining as lead
maintainer with all that implies.

The only thing I don't recall having seen is what's the deal with
the rewrite into some other format? Is it in some other repository,
or...? Should patches be done against it, or the current cvs, or...?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: