On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 02:12:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes ("vote time again: stepping down as chair"):
> > Regrettably, there hasn't been any discussion since the end of the last vote
> > about how to manage these rotations properly without adding undue overhead,
> > so I guess that may be something we need to discuss again this round. For
> > my part, I definitely think that a 1-month rotation would be too short,
> > regardless of whether any voting was required, just because anything that
> > happens in the TC takes long enough that we would be doing a whole lot of
> > shuffling of current business between chairs.
> Right. Personally, I don't think this rotation is workable, as I've
> said before. So my current plan is to vote as if I was voting for a
> permanent chair.
Sure, that's understandable. In that case, perhaps we should be asking who
among us is interested in serving as a permanent chair?
I don't mind wearing hats, but this one seems to clash with this tie I'm
wearing (hmm, or is this a noose...)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature