Re: vote time again: stepping down as chair

[Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>]

Steve Langasek writes ("vote time again: stepping down as chair"):
> Regrettably, there hasn't been any discussion since the end of the last vote
> about how to manage these rotations properly without adding undue overhead,
> so I guess that may be something we need to discuss again this round.  For
> my part, I definitely think that a 1-month rotation would be too short,
> regardless of whether any voting was required, just because anything that
> happens in the TC takes long enough that we would be doing a whole lot of
> shuffling of current business between chairs.

Right.  Personally, I don't think this rotation is workable, as I've
said before.  So my current plan is to vote as if I was voting for a
permanent chair.

> Then again, I failed to step down on time because I was focusing on
> resolving the devmapper question first; so maybe asking each chair to
> conclude one item of business per month would actually improve the
> committee's efficacy? :)

:-).

Ian.