[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main



On 2/27/06, Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> I like your improvement to the first paragraph, so if I may I would
> like to accept that as a change to my original proposal (which has
> been voted down anyway).

No problem -- that fits with my intention.

> I would be happy to place your version over Further Discussion, but I
> still prefer mine (with the modification to para 1.)
>
> JOOI, why did you delete:
>
>  AND THE COMMITTEE THEREFORE REQUESTS AS FOLLOWS
>  ...
>
>  10. The Policy Manual maintainers should take steps to adjust the
>     language regarding main and contrib to clarify and improve it.  The
>     Maintainers should take our opinion in paragraphs 7 and 8 as
>     advisory; they should also have regard to opinions from the Leader
>     about the correct effect.
>
> ?

Oops.

That was an artifact of the quoting you used and the
mail client I used.  I had not intended to remove that
paragraph.  if I had been more careful, I would have
noticed its absence and would have included it.

I withdraw my proposal as originally stated, since it was
incomplete.  Please feel free to incorporate its text
in another proposal.

Thanks,

--
Raul



Reply to: