Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main
I miswrote `achieved' as `required'. So I withdraw my previous motion
and propose the following instead, and call for a vote.
WHEREAS
1. ndiswrapper's purpose is to allow non-free drivers to be used.
2. While there may be cases where ndiswrapper can be used
with a DFSG-free driver, these are exceptional.
3. The Committee is by and large satisfied with the intent behind the
language in the Policy Manual regarding the distinction between
non-free and contrib.
4. The Committee does not wish to overturn or change established
political policy about the distinction between main and contrib,
and does not wish to usurp the political authority of the Project
Leader.
5. The Committee's reading of the current Policy Manual wording is
that ndiswrapper falls fairly clearly into the area currently
defined for `contrib'.
6. However, the language in the Policy Manual is somewhat unclear and
ambiguous, and by some readings inconsistent.
THE COMMITTEE CONCLUDES THAT
6. ndiswrapper belongs in contrib.
7. References to `package outside of main', `packages which are not in
our archive at all', etc., in the relevant part of the Policy
Manual, should be changed to refer to `programs' or `software'.
8. The policy manual should be clarified to make it clear that free
software to talk to non-free software over a network can remain in
main. In our opinion the relevant principle is that:
(i) If the user or administrator who is in charge of the Debian
installation would have to adopt non-free software X to make
sensible use free software Y, then Y goes in contrib.
(ii) However, if free software Y is used by the user or administrator
of the Debian system to cope to with someone else's use of non-free
software X on another system not under their control, then Y goes
in main.
AND THE COMMITTEE THEREFORE REQUESTS AS FOLLOWS
9. ftpmasters and the ndiswrapper maintainers should cooperate to move
nsidwrapper to contrib. (If the required 3:1 supermajority is
achieved, the ftpmasters and ndiswrapper maintainers are hereby
required to do so.)
10. The Policy Manual maintainers should take steps to adjust the
language regarding main and contrib to clarify and improve it. The
Maintainers should take our opinion in paragraphs 7 and 8 as
advisory; they should also have regard to opinions from the Leader
about the correct effect.
Ian.
Reply to: