[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main



Raul Miller writes ("Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main"):
> This is my rephrasing of Ian's proposal.  Changes:
> 
> (*) Emphasize the debian dependency issue.
> (*) Emphasize that this is a recommendation, not a command.
> 
> Basically, I'm repeating what Ian has already said.
> 
> I'm proposing this as a votable option.

I like your improvement to the first paragraph, so if I may I would
like to accept that as a change to my original proposal (which has
been voted down anyway).

I would be happy to place your version over Further Discussion, but I
still prefer mine (with the modification to para 1.)

JOOI, why did you delete:

 AND THE COMMITTEE THEREFORE REQUESTS AS FOLLOWS
 ...

 10. The Policy Manual maintainers should take steps to adjust the
    language regarding main and contrib to clarify and improve it.  The
    Maintainers should take our opinion in paragraphs 7 and 8 as
    advisory; they should also have regard to opinions from the Leader
    about the correct effect.

?

That seems necessary to make it clear that we are not trying to
exercise our power to direct the contents of the policy manual.

Ian.



Reply to: