On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:22:35AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > Ok... silence. > This might mean: > (1) everyone is busy > (2) people feel they need to think about this further > (3) the modified version of Ian's proposal that I posted doesn't > properly address some ndiswrapper issue > (4) that proposal might cause some problem for other packages > (5) something else > If it's (2) or (4) perhaps someone could hint at things that might be > problem indicators? 1+5. As noted in my follow-up comments to Ian's proposal, I think the rationale is great, but I draw the opposite conclusion from it. :) I also didn't see that you had called for a vote on this one, just noted that it was "submitted as a votable option", so I was hoping that before voting we could put together a couple of other ballot options representing other points of view that could be voted on as a group, since that's the way that Condorcet works best. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature