On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 04:36:05PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > Does anyone have any reasonable objection to > Stephen Frost's statement that the porting > team should get to choose the name of the > port? > > I'm not asking whether the name choosen is > correct (all the proposed candidate names > have flaws). I'm asking why anyone should > expect to override the porting team's choice. I have no objections to the port team being allowed to choose the name as should be obvious. As I understand it the port team has actually had multiple votes on this issue. Once last year, and then twice in the past month due to Scott's request. All three times the port team has choosen to use amd64 as the name for the port. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature