Re: Beefing up the Technical Committee
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 12:21:48AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Since all the committee get all the mails anyway automatically, I
> don't think forged messages are likely to be a problem - you'd spot
> them because you'd get them.
That's relevant.
> But, if you still want signatures, Guy could create a temporary key
> and you could phone him up at his phone number (which you must have
> on record somewhere), or he could put the new public key in his
> filespace.
Er.. since Guy is in temporary quarters, and since I don't know his
voice, and since I don't relish transcribing a key over the phone,
I'm reluctant to rely on a phone call. However, I could live with him
putting a public temporary key into his file space on master. I could
then put that into a message which I'd sign myself and send to this list.
I want signatures on votes, for the archives. It's all very well that
we understand what we mean, but I think it's also important that we
leave an archive which is fairly unambiguous.
Thanks,
--
Raul
Reply to: