[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Beefing up the Technical Committee

Raul Miller writes ("Re: Beefing up the Technical Committee"):
> I'm concerned about you not being able to sign messages for a month.
> I can either toss the signature requirement on ballots, have you abstain
> until you get things set up, consider the fact that you're able to send
> mail from master.debian.org as sufficient proof, or come up with some
> other system.
> Anyone else have any strong leanings here?

Since all the committee get all the mails anyway automatically, I
don't think forged messages are likely to be a problem - you'd spot
them because you'd get them.  But, if you still want signatures, Guy
could create a temporary key and you could phone him up at his phone
number (which you must have on record somewhere), or he could put the
new public key in his filespace.


Reply to: