Ok that's understandable. Question #1 who pays for this? A datacenter rack costs money. And whoever owns the data center has physical access. The actual computer hardware costs money not just on a one time basis either.
Where does "hardware" begin and end? Does debian need to own the rack rather than renting it? The screws you use to mount the server? The Ethernet cables?
There's a huge cost to maintaining this too. From my understanding there's no mesos cluster setup right now, no kubernettes, no working openstack api. Creating a private Debian cloud is a lot of work. Not creating a private Debian cloud and just having a bunch of ad hoc servers is probably even more work in the long run.
The idealogy is admirable but we need to define clearly what problem we're trying to solve. Is it avoiding vendor lock in? If so there might be ways to use google cloud and avoid vendor lockin. Is it trying to keep Google from having access to our private data? If so a good first step would be stripping access from any Google employees who might be Debian maintainers (which would be incredibly silly).
Is it trying to avoid corporate influence? Amazon is already contributing resources (i think might be remembering wrong) and there were plans for Google to join in soon as was mentioned in this thread.
I'm not trying to knock idealogy, it's what makes Debian not Red Hat. All I'm saying is that we need to define what exactly the rules and goals are here so we know what there is to work with.