[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: EC2 image boot time improvements



Tim,

On 9 February 2016 at 18:38, Tim Sattarov <stimur@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree, I'm just not sure if that option is necessary for some users
> and/or platforms. If it is not critical I would disable it or compile as
> a module and blacklist by default.

Only noticed now, but this is a known Xen bug[1] and was already
mentioned here[2]. James Bromberger suggested exactly this
approach[3], which seems to be adopted by CoreOS with success[4][5].

This was proposed at the "debian-kernel" mailing list[6] as well. Ian
Campbell looks a little bit skeptical of compiling it as a module[7].

I'm not sure how things work at the Debian Kernel team, because they
have to deal with a lot of use cases, taking care not to break
anything. Can you talk to them to look at this possibility again?

> I see thanks for explanation.

You're welcome.

> I've just double checked: Debian package doesn't have that change yet.

This is another thing we're already talking about[8]. :-)

[1]: http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/43
[2]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2014/11/msg00002.html
[3]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2014/11/msg00003.html
[4]: https://github.com/coreos/bugs/issues/208
[5]: https://github.com/coreos/coreos-overlay/pull/1206
[6]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2014/09/msg00229.html
[7]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2014/09/msg00233.html
[8]: https://github.com/andsens/bootstrap-vz/issues/278

-- 
Tiago "Myhro" Ilieve
Blog: https://blog.myhro.info/
GitHub: https://github.com/myhro
LinkedIn: https://br.linkedin.com/in/myhro
Montes Claros - MG, Brasil


Reply to: