On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 08:15:31PM +0000, Pierre Couzy wrote: > > Do you know if the packaging in the working has been submitted for > > integration into Debian proper? > > To be honest, I have no clue of what "proper" means in this context. Sorry for the ambiguity. I just meant to say an official Debian package, available via the Debian archive, as opposed to a package maintained on a 3rd party repository. > I have begun to read a lot of things on packaging, but it's not a > small task. If someone with expertise in that domain is willing to > spend an hour with me it will speed things up. /me hopes that some of the DDs that expressed interest in Azure support will pick this up. You know who you are :-) > As this is still new, I would suggest we choose the first alternative > for the time being, and learn. It should not be very long (a few > months ?) before we have something stable and usable, even if the VHDs > are hosted somewhere else. At that point we reassess our options. Put it this way, this sounds convincing. hyper-v is used essentially as spec gathering / quality checking, but once the info are gathered they could be used independently to build the actual images, without needing hyper-v. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature