On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 08:39:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > 4) CLI tools - not initially here. There's lots to discuss with > > regards to packages of it; who should maintain it, what is the > > copyright, and where should the repo be. I would love to, but I > > don't have answers for those questions right now. > > They are non-free, so I think that we should not have them by default. Strong ACK. I feel pretty strongly about the fact that, to advertise official Debian images of *any* public cloud out there 1/ they shall only contain DFSG-free software by default, and 2/ we should be able to create them using only DFSG-free software. AFAIU from discussions thus far, that is indeed the case for the AWS images. Is that correct? OTOH I'm not sure that is the case for the Azure images, as of yet? Pierre? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Debian Project Leader . . . . . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature