Re: Bug#542241: simple-cdd: Deal better with non-official codenames
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Now, the alternative is to not create the symlinks and have a way to
> tell debian-cd “well CODENAME is foo, but for boot-enabling scripts,
> please use those of lenny”.
I agree that as simple-cdd is the wrapper here that has the goal of making
things easier for the user it should take care of such things itself.
Especially as I can well imagine taking this one logical step further: use
these files by default, but drop in that custom file. That would have to
be managed by simple-cdd.
I see no need to complicate d-cd for this.
Just my private opinion.
Cheers,
FJP
Reply to: