Re: emacs split up

[josh <jbuhl_nospam@gmx.de>]

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>>2) isn't emacs important enough to be on the first cd? It was for woody.
> 
> 
> I'm not sure about the details regarding this issue, but I do know
> that the package order on the CD is partly depending on the relative
> popularity of packages as reported by popularity-contest
> (<URL:http://popcon.debian.org/>).  Perhaps emacs is too far down on
> that list?
> 

Hmmm, it's an interesting theory, but then why should emacsen-common be
on cd 1? Certainly loads of people with popularity contest don't just
have emacsen-common installed, and not the rest, eh? :-)


-j

any replies can please bcc me at jbuhl_nospam {at] gmx (dot} de , since
I'm not subscribed.