On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:36:25PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: >Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >> I can well believe what you're seeing. The way I suggest to fix this: >> >> * remove the auto-generated files from cvs altogether: >> * tasks/base-sarge >> * tasks/debian-installer >> * tasks/debian-installer+kernel >> >> * Add a dependency on debootstrap to generate the base-$suite file as >> needed >> >> * A full debian-cd run should generate the >> tasks/debian-installer{,+kernel} as needed too. If people don't >> have a full mirror attached for the arches they're targetting then >> they're going to struggle to do anything anyway. It's not clear why >> these were ever committed into cvs, and I agree it was a mistake. > >That would indeed be better than the hack I put in for >tasks/debian-installer+kernel. Doing a similar hack for >tasks/debian-installer was unmaintainable anyway. OK. >> Does this sound reasonable? The next question - do we want to do this >> _now_, or will it wait until after the sarge release so we don't risk >> destabilising too much? I guess I'm asking how much change we're >> likely to see in d-i between now and the release. Your call, really. > >I don't really anticipate needing to update tasks/debian-installer >before release. The debian-installer+kernel lists kernel packages to >install and it will be changing over the next couple of weeks. Fine. I'm a little busy right now getting the woodyr4 images built. Once I'm done with those I'll move on to these changes for you. I may be in touch to ask for help with them... :-( -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com "...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user' as meaning someone who's only ever written one device driver." -- Daniel Pead
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature