On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:58:45PM +0000, Philip Hands wrote: > >While we're on the subject, I've since realised that the thing that >was taking most of the time when generating the images was jigdo, >since a run using jigdo takes over 2 hours per CD on open, whereas >just producing ISO images takes under 10 mins per CD (once you get >into the production of CDs phase). > >Am I doing something wrong? I don't remember jigdo slowing things >down quite that badly. Is this a symptom of our ever expanding >package pool? It's probably somewhere between the two, to be honest. In a measure of how much faster things can go, sledge is doing iso and then jigdo files every ~25-30 minutes once the layout stage is done. I have sparc done (I believe - I'm waiting on Ben to respond to tell me if I wasted all of last night), and I'm quickly testing the s390 jigdo files now before I upload them to open. ppc coming soon. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com "C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone
Attachment:
pgpJWZuLFNZ0n.pgp
Description: PGP signature