Re: Collaboration from ubuntuBSD project
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 03:04:57PM +0000, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I had a skim through. I'd say in 80% of cases, the package is fine in
> Debian and it was *buntu that broke it (such as removing the [linux-any]
> tags from Build-Depends, or the "any-" prefixes in Architecture lists).
>
> These FTBFS are already fixed in Debian sid:
>
> * gpac
> * grantlee
> * ilmbase
> * java-common
> * libgtop2
> * lirc
> * libburn
> * libjpeg-turbo
> * mesa
>
> These patches are probably not needed in Debian sid:
>
> * qca2
> * samba
> * subversion
> * tupi
>
> For this one we have a better patch already in
> https://bugs.debian.org/810982 :
>
> * net-snmp
>
> And these were all *buntu-specific (e.g. Mir) :
>
> * libcolumbus
> * lightdm
> * gtk+3.0
> * xorg-server
Cool! Thanks for the review. Will keep this in mind :-)
--
Jon Boden
ubuntuBSD -- Unix for human beings
http://www.ubuntubsd.org/ -- https://twitter.com/ubuntuBSD
Reply to: