Hi, On 20/03/2016 7:35 PM, Adam Wilson wrote: > Wouldn't it have better to focus on developing Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, > which could do with the extra attention/work? > > Just curious. What was the rationale? The other part of the problem is that Debian/KfreeBSD is no longer an officially supported version of Debian; unofficially it has support, but not officially. That is, there is no current "stable" release of Debian/KfreeBSD...., it is not a production release. I wish that KfreeBSD had more love and was a fully supported version of Debian, but unfortunately it is not. It /may/ be better to go straight to FreeBSD direct instead because of this. Which means escaping the horror of systemd as well as not having the same "Debian" way of configuration setup. AndrewM
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature