[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

Peter Palfrader, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:39:02 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 12:05:06 +0000, a écrit :
> > > Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386?  I assume it has no
> > > security support, there may be some unofficial packages used;  are
> > > therefore none of their machines DSA?
> > 
> > We are still stuck in the "not released arch => no DSA machine => not
> > released arch" loop.
> Except that it's not a loop.  DSA has indicated time and time again that
> if an arch qualifies for a release in all other aspects, we'd be running
> buildds and porterboxes close to the release.  And, TTBOMK, the release
> team has so far accepted that.  IOW the fact that hurd is not being
> released with jessie is not due to not having d.o systems.

Ok, then I don't understand why there are "DSA-admined buildds" and
"security buildds" columns in the release qualification sheet.


Reply to: