Re: Plan B for kfreebsd
I'd really like to hear others' thoughts on my ideas in this thread.
This can only happen with many people working together, so I need to
know which ideas from my brainstorming seem outlandish/crazy, which
are appealing, and who'd like to be involved.
Among users and potential contributors, what sounds good? On a scale
of 0 (= no interest) through 9 (= would like to have / help with):
[ ] making any kind of unofficial kfreebsd release at all
[ ] trying to support it like a stable release alongside Debian jessie
[ ] trying to support it as a long-term stable release
[ ] releasing sooner than official Debian (e.g. within in 1-3 months)
[ ] releasing more often than official Debian (shorter cycle)
[ ] having an unofficial rolling release alongside Debian testing
[ ] having a supplemental repository for unofficial/patched packages
Please throw in more ideas too; still enumerating at this stage,
we'll worry about resources later.