[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Plan B for kfreebsd

Christoph Egger wrote:
> It means we need a stable release of some sort to keep DSA provided
> hardware. That's currently buildds and porterboxes.

That's annoying.

To provide stable/security support ourselves, it seemed we'd need an
unofficial repo, and that doesn't sound like something DSA could use.

Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386?  I assume it has no
security support, there may be some unofficial packages used;  are
therefore none of their machines DSA?

Steven Chamberlain

Reply to: