On 28/11/13 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote: > kFreeBSD was a technology preview, and has not generated enough user > interest to bring in sufficient install base to continue in this > state. > > We will review this situation after 28th January 2014. > Architectures still causing us concern at that point will join > ia64 in no longer being considered for britney migrations and may > be dropped from testing after a further period. I'm unclear on what this means, or what should happen by that date to ensure it is considered sufficient to continue in 'this state' (meaning, a release architecture and considered for Britney migration?). An obvious place for a porter assess their own compliance might be to look the release team's policy document on this: > [ARCH-POL] http://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_policy.html but the only thing I see relating to the above, is "Users: ... at least 50" which is currently true of both kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386. as demonstrated by popcon. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain steven@pyro.eu.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature