|
On 02/27/2013 03:08 AM, Martin wrote:
Thanks for the all the help, i am sorry if i offended
anyone as i truly did not intend to offend anyone with my second
post. I just know from experience that some communities are not as
willing to provide source to newcomers as others even when it is
open-source and for understandable reasons. The comment is in no
way a reflection of what i think about your willingness to help,
and i am very appreciative of the help given. I honestly had the
feeling people may not know as it is 10 years or more ago. Thank
you.
One last question and excuse me for my lack of knowledge in this,
but with such limited resources from the Debian GNU/NetBSD
project, how much of the current GNU userland tools (i.e. glibc
etc) are transferable across without modification to persay the
NetBSD kernel?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Arno
Töll <arno@debian.org>
wrote:
Hi,
On 26.02.2013 08:44, Martin wrote:
> So i thought maybe from such a little response, people
either don't know or
> are unwilling to provide for some random who appears to
have just joined
> the mailing list.
help. However, as Steven said in a later post in this thread
most of use
barely know more than you do on that case.
The kNetBSD project was dead long before most of us joined
Debian.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
I've got limited experience here, but my reason for looking for the
glibc port was just that porting glibc is a hardcore thing to do.
So you better pray you won't have to do that.
|