Re: My ideas
On 21-Oct-2000 Dan Papasian wrote:
> Secondly, it's strength is mainly in its userland, which shares
> much in common with Net and Free when it comes to security. Dump
> the userland to replace it with Debians, and you've thrown
> all that away.
In fact, I meant replacing userland also -- but then we would get OpenBSD
instead of Debian ;-) Forget it, just a crazy idea.
Anyway, it would be much easier in case of any special needs, to
replace the BSDs as a kernel, once the port will be done.
> certain computational tasks. To say that one is "better" than
> the other is crazy.
Oh, sorry. By "improved" I meant the amount of hardware supported,
i.e. the drivers. For sure, I won't judge the kernel itself - they
are all based on one 4.4 code, anyway :))
> regarding technical superiority, but between NetBSD and FreeBSD
> kernels it becomes very close..
Sure, my mistake.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: Wartan Hachaturow <wart@softhome.net>
Date: 21-Oct-2000
Time: 23:46:23
Reply to: