Re: +1 (was Re: netcfg: proposal for template change)
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 1/12/20 1:05 AM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:11:13PM +0000, Justin B Rye wrote:
> >>> [...] It might be better to simplify in the general direction of
> >>>
> >>> The value you provided is not a usable IPv4 or IPv6 address.
> >>> Please consult your network administrator and try again.
> >>
> >> that. (+1)
> >
> > What about home users?
> > That string does not work for them ad-hoc ...
>
> Nearly every version of Windows uses that phrase though :).
Ok, so I will go with above proposal.
(even if something like "Windows has it too, so that's ok" usually is not
an argument ;-) )
Thanks
Holger
--
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Reply to: