[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#969377: Bug reopen



El 2020-09-05 a las 14:06 +0200, Holger Wansing escribió:

> Hi Camaleón and Javier,
> 
> Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
> > reopen 969377
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have to disagree.
> > 
> > The GIT file has not been properly reviewed and should not be uploaded.
> > 
> > Please keep the file attached on the bug report that has passed the 
> > Spanish translation team guidelines.
> 
> I would like to get this sorted out shortly...
> Otherwise we would have a installation-guide GIT tree being unfit for getting 
> uploaded.
> 
> 
> @Camaleón:
> The file you submitted via bugreport had several glitches, which were fixed
> so far by Javier as far as I can see, and this was explained to you on the
> l10n-spanish list under
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-spanish/2020/08/msg00059.html
> and those fixes look ok to me (I cannot read Spanish though).

I already explained to Javier (on and also off-list) the reasons why I 
won't accept the proposed changes¹. If he wants to make a review on the 
files, he must follow the required steps to get the job done. 
Uploading the file by his own wihout sharing it on the list is not the 
proper way Debian Spanish transltors team do work.

So I stand the files to be uploaded to GIT are the ones I provided, and 
not others.

> If you now call for additional review to be needed, that's really complicated,
> because when I compare what we have in GIT now against you file in this
> bugreport, I get a diff which shows every single line being different!
> That's because of the Windows-style line endings, already mentioned by Javier.
> Even if I convert those back to the correct ones, I get a diff with 2684 lines!
> It is clear, that reviewing such changings is inpossible in a reasonable time.
> So, your file makes it really hard to review your work.

I don't know about any problem on Windows-style line endings as I do 
the translation work on Debian. None of the usual tools I run to check 
the PO file (POFileSpell, POFileStatus and POFileChecker) reported 
critial errors, just the usual ones for spelling.

Should there is any problem with the format of PO files I have provided, 
just tell me what the exact problem is and I will make the proper 
changes and then upload the PO files again to the proper bug report.

¹ https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-spanish/2020/08/msg00058.html

Cheers,

-- 
Camaleón 


Reply to: