Hey, Looking at names… Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> (2018-05-09): > Yup. In fact, at this point I declare the conversion to be as done as > it's going to be. I've just imported these test repos into the > installer-team area: > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i I guess this is fair, even if people might confuse that with the (real) debian-installer package/repository. > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/di-i-manual This seems to be named this way, now? https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i-manual Can't we just go for that instead, which would have the benefit of matching the source package name? https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/installation-guide > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/di-i-archive Apparently named https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i-archive now, which looks fine if we keep the d-i name for the old svn top-level (see first point). Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature