[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: Handling backports for d-i components



Ian Campbell <ijc@debian.org> (2015-11-03):
> Such as adjustments to be made to build in the older suite that's never
> happened to me (just lucky I expect). In that case keeping some sort of
> branch around does seem useful.

Exactly; from my limited bpo experience, disabling multi-arch was a
usual usecase, but that's history now. ;)

> Ehem, yes. Now done! Sorry.

Looks good to me now, thanks! No big deal, wasn't sure I was checking
properly, but ls-remote seemed to have a definitive answer.

> Sounds good to me, themoreso to me since it means I don't need to
> change anything for my current backports (other than remembering to
> actually push the tag!)

Don't we all love not changing things? :)

Thanks for the quick turnaround, I'll go back to my own backports now.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: