[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cdebconf 0.159

On Thu, 2012-04-05 at 07:53 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Having thought about it a bit more today, I believe moving the template
> > for cdebconf/frontend/gtk to cdebconf.templates is the right thing to
> > do. Although it would put the text in the "wrong" package, it would be
> > in its dependency, and still wouldn't be displayed unless cdebconf-gtk
> > is installed. It would also avoid for us to ship an unused template in
> > cdebconf-gtk-udeb and the consequences in terms of size.
> > 
> > Any objection to moving it ?
> That doesn't have a great importance for the l10n magic, so feel
> free..:-)

I (obviously) moved that one. I also noticed some changes, and that you
seem to have some concerns about making it easy for translators to make
mistakes. If it's not actually causing you more trouble, I can suggest
converting the 'none' frontend to the same scheme as the others. It
would then look like :

Template: cdebconf/frontend
Type: select
Choices-C: ${choices}
Choices: ${echoices}
# :sl6:
_Description: Interface to use:
 Packages that use debconf for configuration share a common look and
 You can select the type of user interface they use.


Template: cdebconf/frontend/none
Type: string
# :sl6:
_Description: None
 'None' will never ask you any question.

What do you think ?

Reply to: