[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] Dealing with mdadm superblock metadata default change

also sprach Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> [2010.02.12.1238 +1300]:
> > but I think we should make 0.9 the default for squeeze and move
> > to 1.1 only afterwards, once grub-pc knows how to deal with it.
> Do you want to do that in mdadm itself, or should D-I do it? For
> consistency mdadm seems more logical.

Yes, I think it should be in mdadm. It should be as easy as

 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"the college students who are using lsd and marijuana today do not
 comprise a criminal class. they are not drug addicts seeking to
 escape. they're your best educated, your most creative, and your
 most couragious, young people. and like it or not, they might build
 you a new civilisation."               -- porcupine tree, voyage 34

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

Reply to: