[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: D-I in Release Notes update



Hi,

[I already reported this to debacle, I have no info if there was a reaction already.
Then I read the mail on debian-boot, that Christian found an error in the release 
notes.]


On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:56:55 +0100 Christian Perrier wrote:
> A paragraph is very unclear:
> 
[...]
> 
> I'm afraid this just means nothing...:-(
> 
> So, I'll need to rewrite it.

I found some more:

# type: Content of: <chapter><section><para>
#: en/installing.dbk:34
msgid ""
"There has been a lot of development on the Debian Installer since its first "
"official release with &oldreleasename; resulting in both improved hardware "
"support and some exciting new features."
msgstr ""
"Es wurde am Debian-Installer viel entwickelt seit seinem ersten offiziellen "
"Erscheinen mit &oldreleasename;, was zu verbesserter Hardware-Unterstützung, "
"sowie einigen neuen Funktionen führt."

	This comes to:
	... since its first official release with Etch resulting ...

	but this is not correct, the Debian Installer came up with Sarge the
	first time. Write "Sarge" without any entity?

	Or:
	What is this chapter about? Development since Etch, right? 
	So change to:

	"There has been a lot of development on the Debian Installer since the
	release of &oldreleasename; resulting in ... "


# type: Content of: <chapter><section><section><variablelist><varlistentry><listitem><para>
#: en/installing.dbk:78
msgid ""
"When used with a functional network access, the installer will upgrade all "
"packages that were updated since the initial release of &releasename;. This "
"upgrade happens during the installation step, before the installed system is "
"booted"

	dot is missing at the end.



Greetings

Holger

-- 

==============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 2.3.0
    under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 4.0 Etch
        http://counter.li.org/,  Registered LinuxUser #311290
=============================================================


Reply to: